Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Lost Son
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Lara❤Love 04:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Long Lost Son
I'm not really sure this film meets WP:MOVIE, based on [1] and [2]. The latter is the NY times that simply mentions the film as a directory/guide. Let's see what the community thinks about this. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - There are no sources listed in the article, does not meet WP:MOVIE, IMO. Tnxman307 (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete -- It could probably be rewritten into something notable. As it stands, however, it doesn't belong.Ecoleetage (talk) 19:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment if this is deleted then weak Redirect to Parable of the Prodigal Son--Lenticel (talk) 23:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete -- This article is rubbish.. not up to standard.. maybe it could be re written. (user: alec1990 30/04/08) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.18.174 (talk) 03:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
