Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Oratory School Schola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bduke (talk) 10:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Oratory School Schola

London Oratory School Schola (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No sources, it is just a school choir and self-promoting WazzaMan (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Merge to London Oratory School due to improvement. Stifle (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. I agree with Stifle and WazzaMan. It is obvious the article was created just to promote the choir without any care for referencing. If there are no sources, it should be gone. Keylock191 (talk) 10:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC) keylock191
  • Vote struck since user later voted merge below. --PeaceNT (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. It is a quite good start of an article. I rather wish the unreferenced tag had been permitted to stay on a little to give opportunity for them to be added. GoogleNews shows many independent reliable sources and verifies some of the notable claims (recordings of several major movie soundtracks). Even had the nominator been unable to find the sources, I can't understand why he wouldn't have suggested a merge to London Oratory School. DoubleBlue (Talk) 20:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - obviously. The New York Times filmography here, underscores the notability of this outstanding choir. TerriersFan (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - I have started to add sources to the article. I am concerned by large scale content removal from both this page and also London Oratory School. Whilst unsourced content can, of course, be removed a great deal of uncontroversial factual information was removed from the School article rather than adding sources. Tagging and sourcing is the better way of developing pages. TerriersFan (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: TerriersFan. You need to read wikipedia's guidelines again. Find the sources yourself, then add it to wikipedia. Everything needs to be referenced. Keylock191 (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC) keylock191

• Merge It should be merged with the article for London oratory school Keylock191 (talk) 10:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC) keylock191
• Keep per significant improvement by TerriersFan, reliable sources added. The choir is notable on its own; no need to merge to school article. --PeaceNT (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.