Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Law Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep because: no reason given for deletion by nominator; no response to note on talkpage. Non-admin closure. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 15:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Law Review

London Law Review (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Finishing an incomplete nomination. As such, I abstain. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 12:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - anyone want to try and rescue this article? If the claims made in it are true then it probably meets WP:N and simply needs to be sourced. /Blaxthos 15:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep It looks significant Johnbibby 15:42, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment That's what I thought - I didn't find anything wrong, just needs some sources. I tried leaving a note for the IP address (User talk:217.43.201.174) who listed this article on the AfD page, asking why he wanted it deleted, but no response yet. Speedy close this perhaps? - no reason for deletion from nominator. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 15:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.