Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lon Milo DuQuette

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus Cool Hand Luke 02:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lon Milo DuQuette

Lon Milo DuQuette (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

fails WP:BIO and WP:V. It's been tagged as unsourced since August 2006, but no sources have been provided. 999 (Talk) 19:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

  • delete per nom. Chris 22:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep—actually passes WP:BIO pretty easily as far as I'm concerned. Both in terms of being the subject of multiple non-trivial published works and in terms of being a published author with multiple independent reviews. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Note, of course, that those are only some of what I could find from google--there's likely much more in print-only format. --Jackhorkheimer 06:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


  • Keep per Jackhorkheimer Zero sharp 06:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I think the only sentence that now lacks reference is that which is about Lon's Archbishop-dom. The other paragraphs are merely summarizing the titles of his books (e.g. as it is read: His books are about Freemasonary, Tarot ...) What else remains that may need reference? That he is humorous or where he lives? Or maybe his marriage?! --Sepand 18:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
    • You do realize that you have to use third-party sources, don't you? Autobiographical sources are not sufficient. Also, everything in an article about a living person must be cited. Dave Null 19:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:V. Dave Null 19:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.