Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loma Lux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deoete. W.marsh 16:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Loma Lux

• Delete as advertisement. Fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. mtz206 (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Also see Plymouth Pharmaceuticals, which is a nearly identical article. --John Nagle 19:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - along with multiple products being added as articles with blatant unsourced claims of perfect safety and no known side effects: Psorizide Forte Eczemol, Acunol all of which also tagged for deletion David Ruben ^Talk 19:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • yeah, I PROD'd those product articles. --mtz206 (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Creator pasted a justification, which I've moved to the talk page [1] (and replied). --mtz206 (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete after reading the creator's justification (they have a D&B rating, and they were in the exhibitor list at a convention). Fan1967 20:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per mtz206, who is correct about the value of a D&B rating. -- Docether 20:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advertisement and fails to meet the requirements for WP:Corp--Auger Martel 11:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.