Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolarcoaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, redirect to LOL (Internet slang) and protect. - Daniel.Bryant 09:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lolarcoaster

Lolarcoaster (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a non-notable web site claiming notability; neither claim (London Times "Best Website" award, Rolling Stones "Best-Kept Secret of the Web") can be verified. Looking at the site itself it is just a message board which does not appear to have any claims to notability (I didn't look very closely since it made my brain hurt. That is not a reason for deletion in itself, of course.). Was previously removed in 2004, see Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Lolarcoaster - since that was an old system I'm not sure that qualifies the page for speedy deletion. Bonadea 09:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Flush it, it is just a non-notable messageboard with 57 members (and according to the site, 6 post regularly) and a little over 1000 google hits (for lolarcoaster, lolarcoaster.com gets 800 or so)-from K37 09:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, is a few more than 6 who have posted a lot to the site. But even so... with only 25 users with more than 10 posts, I'd be totally amazed if this site turns out to be notable. Though if in the suprising case that some evidence of this is found, then please do ignore my vote (and also please warn me on my talk page of Armageddon). The Roussard Formula could be added to bad jokes and other deleted nonsense. Mathmo Talk 10:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete invalid claims about notability look totally unfounded when you visit it Whilding87 16:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to LOL (Internet slang) and possibly protect: Article is unnotable, but the term is an alternate version of "lollercoaster", which derives from "LOL".--SeizureDog 20:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep this is discrimination against the Australia gay Jewish community, we will not stand for this and will see you in court if you continue to censor us. Villa de njd 10:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unsourced, non-notable forum, but I went ahead and BJAODNed the Roussard Formula section. Dave6 talk 10:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Canley 10:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Patent nonsense. Clear speedy delete. -- Chuq 11:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable (and by the looks of it, very stupid) messageboard. Fails WP:WEB pretty comprehensively. Lankiveil 02:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.