Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lojinx

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:43, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lojinx

Not notable indie recording label. Only three unknown (to me) bands signed--ZayZayEM 08:26, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Professional enough-looking site, but seems non-notable. 750-ish Google hits, three relatively unknown artists (one, Farrah, also possible VfD?), and from looking at the codes of the CDs, appears there've only been seven CDs released by the label altogether. Just not notable enough yet. Delete. --Lawlore 21:12, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, article is helpful. Wyss 21:45, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Could you elaborate please? I didn't find anything inherently helpful in "Lojinx is an independent record label, formed in South London in 2003" (text of the article). Could you have meant to reply to the above topic, about Greek homoeroticism, rather than this one? This vote just seemed a bit odd given your other votes. Thanks very much. --Lawlore 22:50, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

For me, when it comes to independent music, the more collaboration, the more encyclopedic. Also, seven releases without major distribution is notable, and is ample evidence of meaningful, original musical activity. Wyss 13:31, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, article does not establish notability. Megan1967 02:53, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. non-notable. at0 22:43, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:31, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.