Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Park High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sango123 23:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Logan Park High School

Is not suitable for Wikipedia Griggonator 20:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC) Griggonator

• Strong Keep This is perfectly fine for Wikipedia, per the terms of listing higher-education schools. The page seems to have been the source of numerous vandalism attack however. Wildthing61476 20:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Wildthing61476. I'm going to clean this article up now. Yanksox 21:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. High Schools meet the requirements. Kafziel 21:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• keep High schools are kept. CalJW 21:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Unfortunately, the policy is to keep any high school that is created. This one is no different than the 10 million other high schools, so should be kept. Ted 23:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Very Weak Keep I don't see a volation here, but it does seem like there would be one... OTAKU 00:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Enough with the non notable schools already.JoshuaZ 00:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Nom needs to do way, way better than "is not suitable". --JJay 01:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• strong keep very notable high school, much more so than many others kept here. article needs improving tho. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 01:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment That others were not deleted does not mean we should keep this one. In any case, the only claim of notability made in the entry is that it had a student who was finalist of a reality tv show. That doesn't seem notable to me. JoshuaZ 03:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems notable enough for mine especially given the established concensus on schools. Capitalistroadster 03:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Unfortunate, unwilling keep - until the policy changes and we can get rid of all the non-notable high schools, we have to keep this. But as soon as the policy changes, I will be more than happy to write "delete" in instead. The policy must change. --Midnighttonight 03:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC) Delete then (for reason below) --Midnighttonight 00:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:SCHOOL was rejected. It is not policy. See the top of the page. JoshuaZ 03:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Enough with dogmatic deletionism, particulary regarding high schools. The article can certainly use work, but there's no justification for deletion. Let's come up with mutually-agreeable school deletion criteria before any more AfD's are submitted. Alansohn 03:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. One of NZ-SI's more prominent and important high schools. I've added a bit and cleaned the article up. If this needs deletion I can easily find some 100,000 - 200,000 articles which should also be deletion as being far less worthy of an entry in Wikipedia. Grutness...wha? 05:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Grutness.-gadfium 09:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. High schools are usually notable. TruthbringerToronto 00:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. What is it that people have against schools? This one is clearly notable. -- Avenue 14:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Enough with the pointless high school nominations already. Silensor 17:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all schools are notable see Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep.  ALKIVAR™ 17:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alkivar. --Myles Long 18:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.