Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loebage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-28 07:49Z

[edit] Loebage

Loebage (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable "position." Neologism. No sources. Search for Loebage returns 1 ghit that isn't WP related. Prod removed by author. --OnoremDil 16:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete -- as this is someone's idea of a bad joke. Neologism, non-existant, non-notable. Bearian 18:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Hystlen Caeth is a possible vandal; see his talk page. Bearian 18:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as blatant WP:BOLLOCKS and hoax - can't see any grounds for a speedy though unless it's some kind of complicated attack page on someone with the same name — iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as worthless garbage. Burntsauce 22:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.