Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locking high heels
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge/redirect I am redirecting for now, anyone who wants to merge information can try. W.marsh 21:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Locking high heels
While such footwear may exist, the contents of this article are pure original research. A couple of pornographic stories (NSFW) are not reliable sources. Maybe a brief mention in some fetishism-related article is in order if sources can be found. Sandstein 05:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing but shops and DeviantART on google. MER-C 06:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge a brief mention into shoe fetishism if this is a common element of pornography. Otherwise delete for lack of references. Shimeru 06:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge/Delete As above. ><RichardΩ612 UW 09:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge/delete as above. JIP | Talk 18:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per Shimeru. Danny Lilithborne 22:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge as above. Yet another Bizarre fetish... Grutness...wha? 23:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Er, sorry, but what sourced content exactly would all of you like to merge? And we still don't know if this is "a common element of pornography", as Shimeru stipulated. (I mean, this is the Internet. There's got to be some porn experts someplace... :-) Sandstein 23:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, as with all unsourced articles, google is your friend. Not that it's the part of the web that I';d normally go trampling though, but... they certainly exist, and I have heard the term before, so... [1], [2] [3]. Having said that, I can find very few references other than in sales outlets. Grutness...wha? 00:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Er, sorry, but what sourced content exactly would all of you like to merge? And we still don't know if this is "a common element of pornography", as Shimeru stipulated. (I mean, this is the Internet. There's got to be some porn experts someplace... :-) Sandstein 23:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, nn. --MaNeMeBasat 16:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
