The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 15:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Non-notable neologism or protologism. Google gives hits but can't find anything related to this interpretation. Weregerbil 18:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Unverifiable neologism —This user has left wikipedia 18:35 2006-02-05
Delete. Even if it were established word, WP:WINAD. --Fuhghettaboutit 18:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Yet another neologism that should've been {{prod}}ed. --Kinu 18:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.