Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobstrini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was crush with hammer. DS 04:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lobstrini

Procedural nom; I've just removed a {{db-nonsense}} from this as whatever it is, it's not unsalvageably incoherent & speedy's inappropriate for possible hoaxes. As there's probably no subject on which I know less than Uruguayan fishing boats, sending it here in the hope that someone who does know can determine whether this is a hoax or not. Procedural nom so I abstain. — iridescent (talk to me!) 21:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete with butter sauce. No sources, zero Google hits, looks like a hoax to me. NawlinWiki 21:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Shouldn't be any issue. Not a single google hit, nada, google says "No standard web pages containing all your search terms were found." and asks me if I meant another word Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per all of the above. Bfigura ^(talk) 21:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• 0 Google hits is a rare thing. Sauté in butter, serves 6. humblefool® 22:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I for one think its real... a duck shaped boat called a Ma - l - ardaquitus... :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.101.60 (talk) 22:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Boil it alive. Hoax. Corvus cornix 23:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with a side of snow. See new comment below. --Darkwind (talk) 04:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC) No hits on dogpile or mamma metasearch either. --Darkwind (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Zero Google hits; possibly made up after one too many martinis in a lobster bar. But if we drop it into a boiling AfD discussion, will it scream? Accounting4Taste 00:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

No martini was involved... just the rusty workings of my strange mind... it is indeed a hoax... if a very well thought out and written one, even if I do say so myself! It was intended for a friend of mine but sods law has struck and his mac has decided to pack up... dont suppose we could just leave it on here? (that was a joke). Apologies to anyone who feels there time has been wasted, and to wikipedia for breaking the rules. It was just meant as a bit of harmless fun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.101.60 (talk • contribs)

• While I'm sure it was intended as fun for you and your friend (and I personally find the concept amusing), we take the whole encylopedia thing rather seriously. I now recommend speedy deletion (perhaps the microwave will come in handy...) since the author has admitted the source of the article is a hoax. --Darkwind (talk) 04:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment FWIW, the anon IP wasn't the creator, User:Sutok was — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Remind me again why we had to delete BJAODN? Brush with a light, buttery sauce and present with garnish. Alba 00:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

The anon user is me, sutok... please feel free to ban me if thats my punishment... :)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.