Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobster neuberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Kept and moved to Lobster Newberg.  (aeropagitica)  22:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lobster neuberg

Delete. Useless, just stick the two sentences in the article "lobster". EdGl 02:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Royboycrashfan 02:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, don't merge Move improved article to Lobster Newberg. While it would be possible to write an encyclopedic article about Lobster Newberg (as it is more commonly spelled), this ain't it. The entry in List of foods named after people is better. And this isn't even a good description of the dish, a better one would be "sauteed lobster in cream sauce." Crypticfirefly 04:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Another remark: if the person who wrote this thinks the dish looks like scrambled eggs, they probably broke the sauce. Here's the original recipe from 1894: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/cookbooks/display.cfm?TitleNo=38&PageNum=425 Crypticfirefly 04:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. dbtfz^talk 04:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Move much-improved content to Lobster Newberg. dbtfz^talk 08:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I added a little bit to the article. Apparently there are a few stories about the creation of Lobster Newberg, so I see no reason why this couldn't become a decent article with some work. It could probably use a move to Lobster Newburg, though. Pagrashtak 06:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nice work, though I would simply have started a new article at Lobster Newberg and ignored this one. Crypticfirefly 07:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC) I added a few more details to your improved version. Crypticfirefly 07:26, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and move as per Pagashtrak. Capitalistroadster 07:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Pagrashtak. --AaronS 22:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep with the spelling correcting move, and list for expansion if you think it needs it. Staxringold 22:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but move to Lobster Newberg. Jude(talk,contribs) 08:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and move per above. youngamerican (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep two real references it enough to make a start of an article even if the content is currently lacking Jon513 12:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I still don't know why we need this article since everything in it is already in the lobster article. Also, this isn't even a subcategory of lobster, it's more like a sub-subcategory, as it's in the subcategory of "lobster as food". Therefore, wouldn't "Lobster (food)" be a more suitable article than this? Some clarity/explanation would be nice. -EdGl 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.