Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Binford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lloyd Binford

Lloyd Binford (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete unsourced article about someone who was head of a redlink organization; so nn we don't know when or where he was born or whether he's even alive today - the kind of stuff that anyone seeking a biography would expect to learn from any decent encyclopedia. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep WP:SOFIXIT: [1] [2] [3] Yngvarr 00:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep See this site. Apparently many people throughout the South in the 1940s listened to this man and respected him, with the consequence that Hollywood, wishing to market movies there, sometimes edited them accordingly. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Having a TIME profile is pretty much the definition of notability. I redirected "Memphis Censor Board" to him because it appears to me that their eras of notability coincide (by the time of his death the role of such boards was greatly reduced). Now if only Richard Arthur Norton would let me get a minute to edit the article ... --Dhartung | Talk 08:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. I have found other sources as well besides those mentioned above and will add them to the article unless someone else does so first. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, seems notable enough as is, what with the TIME profile. Lankiveil (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC).
  • Keep - highly notable if you follow such things. --Lquilter (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep per the feedback provided by Dhartung. RFerreira (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.