Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizz Robbins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 07:33, November 24, 2007

[edit] Lizz Robbins

Lizz Robbins (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log) notability, promotional page by first author who hasn't made any other edits. Wikipedia is not a resume. Prod was removed by inactive user with few edits. Miranda 05:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Semi finalist? Not that being a finalist in that competition would be particularly noteworthy (except in the Maxim Magazine, of course). I fail to see notability. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• There has been edits. I don't see any other argument for this page to be deleted. If you look at any other model, actress, actor or entertainers page you will see their previous works, current works, articles, etc. Wikipedia is for information and a great tool for people to find out about an entire array of things. It seems to be that the reason this page was nominated was personal. Being in The Washington Post (distributed world wide) as well as features in nationally distributed Magazines and being a spokesperson for a major liquor brand that is sold world wide is very notable compared to some entries in Wikipedia where some have even less "significant" experience. Your reason for this page to be deleted is not justified. Also after doing research on the person who nominated this page, it seems the person is or wants to be a member of the nominee's sorority (this person has edited all of the pages related to the sorority, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.) If this is the case why wouldn't the person who nominated this page be supportive of a fellow sorority sister or soon to be sorority sister. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knicksfan4ever (talk • contribs)
  • Also after doing research on the person who nominated this page, it seems the person is or wants to be a member of the nominee's sorority (this person has edited all of the pages related to the sorority, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.) If this is the case why wouldn't the person who nominated this page be supportive of a fellow sorority sister or soon to be sorority sister. - Wonder why this person is looking over my edits, which is kind of scary to me, to know that I am assuming bad faith in nominating this person's resume for deletion? I nominated this article for deletion because this person lacks notability and the encyclopedia article looks like more of a resume. I am thinking that the person who made this comment is a friend of the person or the person herself. She has tried to delete this AFD discussion, once. However, I will try to assume good faith, because she is new. I suggest the person who made that comment to read five pillars of Wikipedia carefully as well as notability. Miranda 01:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

And, I was right. Miranda 01:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Reads more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. Inadequate claims to notability. Caknuck (talk) 03:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.