Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living with Michael Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Close for lack of a rationale for deletion. I would advise the nom to review our policies, and - if this article can be found to fail any of our inclusion criteria, including Notability, Verifiability, or Reliable Sourcing, then a re-nomination may be in order. As noted below, though, not liking the content or subject of an article is insufficient. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Living with Michael Jackson

Living with Michael Jackson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

some hold this a s proof that micheal would hurt children but it has been shown through a video michael made and with the never ending support of the fans adults and children who love and beliee in him that he would never hrut a child and that bashir would try and bring down the kindest man SDLexington (talk) 14:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep bad faith nom. "I Don't Like It" is not a valid reason to bring something to AFD. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 14:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Also not a notable thing it is just a tv programme also bashi has admitted he made it up also michael was found innocent in the courts speedy delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by SDLexington (talk • contribs) 15:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

That's not important the fact is that it is notable via WP:N. It was shown on several notable TV channels and led to the actual court precedings. Please read WP:BEFORE, WP:N and WP:IDONTLIKEIT Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

but doctor the have 40 Most Awesomely Bad Dirrty Songs...Ever on vh1 and that is not an entry also jordy would have made alegatons even if theat had not been shown he was a child that michael took pity on because he had cancer and after michael had cured him then he turned around and tried to get money from a kind man. if they were in bed together it was inercant just to watch films SDLexington (talk) 15:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

okay i see you have changed it to read several notablen tv stations —Preceding unsigned comment added by SDLexington (talk • contribs) 15:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you must understand that simply because you don't like it does not mean it is not notable. Because it led to the court precedings EVEN THOUGH he was found not guilty, that therefore makes it notable. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep and block SDLexington for making a ridiculous amount of trouble (see his contribs). JuJube (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

You mean keep, right? because if not, then the last half of your vote would contadict. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.