Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at Wacken ´99

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Despite the sparse discussion below, a complete lack of WP:RS (and hence, failure of WP:V) provides an overriding policy-based rationale for deletion. Restoration may be requested if WP:RS are found. Xoloz 13:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Live at Wacken ´99

Live at Wacken ´99 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Bootlegs are generally not notable (there are exceptions of course), and this one gives no indication of being such an exception. No reviews in profesional music magazines, no discussions in the mainstream press, no lawsuits attracting a lot of publicity, ... Fails WP:NOTE and WP:MUSIC ("Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage."). Perhaps we need to add to WP:MUSIC that bootlegs, demos and mixtapes are generally not notable, to avoid all these articles... Fram 12:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or Merge to a list of Cradle of fILTH BOOTLEGS --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC) whoops --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge to a destination identified by TheFEARgod. There's a lack of sources showing why this particular concert was notable, or indeed why a bootleg recording thereof is. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.