Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LivISOC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LivISOC

Student organizations at one particular university are rarely notable, and this one is not. An attempt to have the article redirected to the university page and a paragraph added to that page has been repeatedly rejected by the original author, therefore this AfD nomination. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear "Zoe", I don't appreciate your very biased opinion at all and would prefer for you to keep it to youself rather than deleting other peoples hardwork and valid contributions. LJMU-ISOC may be very hard to notice from your part of the world but in Liverpool UK it is one of the most active and dynamic student societies. I would advice you to redirect yourself and your efforts for a more humane purpose rather than deleting and redirecting Islamic Society articles. We will get official Wikipedia clarification concerning the repeated abuse from seemingly Islamophobic quasi-editors. User:Seljuk Soldier|(talk) 20:43, 17 December 2006 (BST)

I knew this was coming. Have to throw out the Islamophobia card, don't you? Coudln't possibly be your lack of understanding of Wikipedia, it has to an ulterior motive on my part. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, the only assertion of notability is the awards, and all but one award is from within Liverpool University. The exception is "3rd Best UK Islamic Society, 2005 Muslim Student Awards, UK" which, in my opinion, does not establish notability. Demiurge 20:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I also have limited IQ. - crz crztalk 20:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Wikipedia is not a free campus society webhost Bwithh 21:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, also if stuff like this keeps happening, a ban is called for. Danny Lilithborne 00:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and salt per Danny. I'm tired of legitimate redirects being reverted. Ohconfucius 07:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Out!!!! --Brianyoumans 18:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Article does not cite multiple third-party reliable sources indicating its notability. Zunaid©^{Please rate me at Editor Review!} 14:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.