Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Girl (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as repost, apparently. Just zis Guy you know? 15:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Little Girl

• This title was on Afd once with a consensus to delete, but it got created again a few hours ago. Please delete. Georgia guy 01:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as redundant (obviously a little girl is a girl at a young age)--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Redirect to Girl. --Allen 01:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Don't even bother with a redirect. This is beginning to look like a page being created as an annoyance. It also appears to reflect nothing other than the writer's own personal definition. Ande B 01:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect and protect. I know, that's an unusual vote, but it seems like the best solution. The page should certainly redirect to girl as it is a likely search term. —Cuiviénen, Thursday, 20 April 2006 @ 01:44 UTC
• If this had a pop culture section with stuff like "Mike Myers played a character named Dieter in Sprockets who would pull out his shirt and pretend he had boobs while saying 'I'm as happy as a little girl'" it would be more difficult to delete this, unfortunately. Since it's a dicdef, delete it. Brian G. Crawford 02:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. If necessary, redirect and protect. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 03:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This page is remarkably unnecessary, and in my view doesn't even deserve a redirect. --Kuronekoyama 04:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per what Kuronekoyama just said. dbtfz^talk 04:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Zero sharp 06:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This should be a Speedy as re-creation of deleted material, IIRC. I don't think a redirect to Girl is necessary or useful, and would perhaps discourage an actual article with this title (which there could be, someday, I think, if one gathered together references and shades of meaning etc.). However, if an article like this is created once again, then screw it, Redirect and Protect. Herostratus 06:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as {{db-repost}} candidate.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an obvious and non-expandable dictdef. The picture could be used somewhere, though. JIP | Talk 07:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as "no encyclopaedic significance"; also as quasi-blatant paed~ -- Simon Cursitor 08:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• 'Speedy Delete per (aeropagitica).--blue520 08:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect and protect these little girls, per Cuivi. Lambiam^Talk 10:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, per (aeropagitica). ~ PseudoSudo 10:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.