The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, nominator withdrawal. Non-admin closure. shoy 01:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
This article is full of statements that really, really need references, but there are none to be found, and as-is it feels like original reserach. Only reference is an external link that only uses the term twice in passing. possible WP:NEO. --YbborTalk 00:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I withdraw this nomination. User:KTo288 has done a great job finding sources. --YbborTalk 01:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.