Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Criminals (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per nominator's change of mind and notability. Turnstep 13:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Little Criminals (film)
Article is about an unreleased film by a notable director. I originally nommed for speedy, but was contested because director is notable. Since the article states that copies are hard to find and that it was unreleased, details about the film are going to be difficult to verify. The film is already mentioned in the directors article. Unless a lot more work is done the article will always remain a stub. Delete unless it has an imdb entry and can be expanded with the usual verifiable details about a movie. TheRingess 17:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It would be nice to have a complete filmography of notable directors on Wikipedia. Let me have a little dig around, I'll see what I can find.--Edchilvers 17:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm back! And look what I found! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113666/ .--Edchilvers 17:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep per loads of awards. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment You guys have changed my mind. I vote to Keep. Perhaps I jumped the gun in nominating this one. I would suggest removing the bit about why it wasn't released, unless a source is provided. Thanks for your work. TheRingess 18:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I've messaged Anthony Grani, the assistant of Stephen Surjik, who shows some activity on the messageboards of imdb on the movies of Stephen Surjik. Hopefully he can give some information about the movie not being released. Repsaj
- Keep notability seems to be established here.--Jersey Devil 23:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Andrew Lenahan. And easily passes the proposed WP:NOTFILM. --Marriedtofilm 23:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.