Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Littl'ans (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep: sourcing was provided during AFD process. Non-admin closure per WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 12:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Littl'ans
Was proposed for deletion but has been nominated on AfD before, hence procedural deprod and listing here.
Original prod reason was: The only weak claim to notability was 2 years ago, nothing apparantly notable has happened with the band since. Unsourced, failing WP:V, no non-trivial independant third party coverage failing WP:N. Flyingtoaster1337 12:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I was the prodder (just saying for the sake of disclosure). Still those reasons above, I don't believe this band is notable enough yet. They did support Babyshambles, 2 years ago. Nothing has happened with them since from the look of it. 2 years is long time for absolutely nothing new to happen to a band. The Kinslayer 12:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - made the top twenty in the UK singles chart, and article alludes to a tour of New York which if it was properly sourced, along with numerous gigs in the UK would easily satisfy the accepted criteria - even without any reference to Pete Doherty! - fchd 16:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'll happily change to a keep if the article becomes decently sourced in that case. But, as it stands the article fails WP:V. The Kinslayer 16:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - After a quick search, I've added sources for the group's tour with Babyshambles, and their UK chart hit. On its own, I suggest the chart hit satisfies WP:MUSIC. Eludium-q36 10:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - The first four results on Google are three Myspace pages and this article, and most of the others are lyrics. The name gets 27,800 hits, as opposed to the 1 million+ hits gotten by other bands. Curtmack 16:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I'm happy with the sourcing in the current version - the BBC, NME and Top 40 seem to fill my interpretation of WP:RS. Per Richard, Top 20 on the UK singles chart, and an international tour, seem to mee WP:MUSIC. Number 2 on the Indie charts is not bad either as an assertion of notability. I see enough here to convince me to !vote keep. Daniel.Bryant 11:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
