Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LitFinder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -Mysekurity^{(have you seen this?)} 06:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LitFinder

Clearly an advertisement, not notable. -- Simpatico 11:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't even try not to look like an ad. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete blatant spam; hits Rule No. 1 on the Spam-O-Tron, starts with the name, intercapped, as a weblink. Burn it. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 18:07, 28 December 2005
• Keep Changes made to the original article, gone are the obvious drunken capitalist overtones.

• Still need to Delete. Yeah, I made changes to it (I'm a newbie, sorry about that) before I realized it's not exactly encyclopedic. Still, this database is nonnotable and doesn't need a wikipedia page. -- Simpatico 04:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.