Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of clichés

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was cliché delete. @pple complain 17:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lists of clichés

Lists of clichés (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article is not a list of clichés, but a list of clichés lists (and a poor compilation at that). With only three dynamically linked entries and five external links, the article seems more of a way to provide external links than a way to present encyclopedia content. In addition to being unreferenced, the topic does not meet Wikipedia:Lists and is merely a content fork best covered by the Cliché article. -- Jreferee t/c 18:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete sheesh. JJL 19:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete; Not surprisingly, all of the redlinked lists are redlinks because they have been deleted. Out of eleven lists, only one of them (List of sports clichés) actually links to a list of clichés, so this has no use. Masaruemoto 21:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "per nom", to use a wikipedia cliché.--Victor falk 21:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no longer serves significant navigation purposes. --Dhartung | Talk 23:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • DELETE ASAP nuff said, we need a REAL LIST OF CLICHÉS (like "everything happens for a reason", "what goes around, comes around", etcetera). this is iaN | talkBACK 3:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Indiscriminate, unmaintainable list. Blueboy96 03:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Trivial and frivilous, really. • Lawrence Cohen 06:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.