Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of letters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of letters

Obviously a non-notable list, I almost speedied it myself. But, prod was removed 11kowrom 22:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete the definition of listcruft. Danny Lilithborne 22:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete for all reasons (I won't suggest a category as an alternative either). Yomanganitalk 22:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - much more useful articles already exist at the various alphabet pages (English alphabet, Lithuanian alphabet, etc). BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 22:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. That's what English alphabet is for! --Gray Porpoise 23:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. My Alt Account 23:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, there is even nowhere to redirect: there are so many different alphabets!
BJAODN? `'mikka (t) 23:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: On the other hand, an alphabetical list of all letters in all alphabets could be handy, for quick search. For example, what was this letter: Gomel, Gamel, Gimel, Gymel, Gumel, Gemel ? And seeing Aleph and Alpha side by side in the list would be instructive `'mikka (t) 23:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
    • There's certainly something to be said for that (I'm surprised we don't have such an article already, but we don't seem to). BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Sadly, that's not what this is. D, E, L, E, T, E.Djcartwright 00:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment: Well, it's not what it was. Take a look now and see if the new version has any merit as a page; I didn't see anything like it on Wikipedia so far. -- nae'blis 04:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete My first un-qualified vote for a Delete. Justification per nom. Jdclevenger 23:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Hello32020 00:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete because the information is much easier used and accessed at pages describing the English alphabet. SliceNYC 01:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete genuinely worthy candidate. Ohconfucius 04:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Without a doubt-delete. Lorty 00:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia already has a page on this: English alphabet. -AMK152 03:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Very Strong Keep or Merge into alphabet, List of alphabets, or similar. This is definitely encyclopedic, and is the first comparitive chart I have seen on wikipedia. Ideally, it will be expanded in the near future. Markovich292 05:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Markovich292, but since there are so many alphabets it will have to be expanded big time. Cheesfgf 14:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep or merge - the table is a good starting point, but needs extending... maybe in another article. Ace of Risk 15:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.