Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pan-Turkists

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] List of Pan-Turkists

Is a list of names, with no explanation or context (even to say what a pan-Turkist is)Simon Cursitor 17:37, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. No real content, just random names of people who don;t sppear to have artciles. -R. fiend 17:56, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. No content, no context. Doesn't even bother to denote where one name ends and the next begins. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:12, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Agree with above users. Sarg 18:21, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• A Pan-Turkist is one who espouses Pan-Turkism, and the reason that the article didn't separate the names is probably that the original author was unfamiliar with wiki-markup. In the actual wikitext, there are line breaks between the names. (I've remedied that problem.) As a raw list of names without any explanation whatever, this is speedy deletion criterion A1 territory, though. There's no context to link this article to Pan-Turkism or explain what this list signifies, and no inclusion/exclusion criteria explaining what qualifies someone to be on this list. Given how short both it and Pan-Turkism are, there's scant justification for a stand-alone list, too. If these people are notable within the field of Pan-Turkism, why aren't any of them even mentioned in Pan-Turkism? It has plenty of room to spare for a list of six names. Uncle G 20:23, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
• Delete. Jacob1207 23:42, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no encyclopaedic content. Megan1967 06:26, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge without redirect at Pan-Turkism, in hope that someone might supply further information about these folks' rôles in the movement.-- Smerdis of Tlön 14:17, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I would be against including these names in the Pan-Turkism article unless someone can dig up some information on them and explain why they belong there. I haven't checked yet, but is there evidence that these are even legit entries? -R. fiend 00:57, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.