Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lissome Avid Engineer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 23:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lissome Avid Engineer

Lissome Avid Engineer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable game character that fails WP:FICTION. Lack of any secondary sources is not compensated by in universe descriptions that read like original research.--Gavin Collins 10:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Strong Delete They actually do appear to be OR, or even possibly CopyVio (I don't have books to check). Iconic characters should be on an Exalted-Wiki, not on Wikipedia. They have zero context outside the game, and I don't even think warrent an redirect. In addition, the following articles are also related.

  • Maiden of the Mirthless Smile
  • Falling Tears Poet
  • Lilith (Exalted)
  • Tepet Ejava
  • Sesus Nagezzer
  • Peleps Deled
  • Sesus Rafara
  • Denovah Avaku
  • Mnemon (Exalted)
  • Tepet Arada
  • Lissome Avid Engineer

These are all the active Iconic character articles for Exalted. Personally, I don't think any of them belong here. Gavin, you are more experienced then I am with AfDs. In this particliuar case, I feel all the articles should be looked at as a whole. Would you mind setting them all up to be discussed here as AfD? The Exalted Template (which is huge), will need to be cut down if this passes. I can assist in that area. The iconics is over half the template by itself. Turlo Lomon 11:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete almost the definition of non-notable, in fact. This isn't about the game or the publication, but characters within the game, and this is fancruft. Also support the broading of the AfD to the others listed by Turlo Lomon, and strongly support deletion of them all. SamBC(talk) 11:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ffm 12:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into a Characters of Exalted article would be first choice, but if no-one wants to bother then delete is fine too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Turlo Lomon, or merge into a list article if not. Percy Snoodle 13:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.