Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lissa Noble
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus to delete). --Stormie 05:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Lissa Noble
Unnotable, unencyclopaedic vanity / worship page. Exploding Boy 21:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree. And I am against the suggestion that information which I find very useful should be removed because someone else thinks I should not be allowed to read it. What a bizzare and arrogant notion. The only thing that should be considered for deletion is idiocy of this type. Posted by User:217.42.59.214
- It should be noted that the above user has made only three edits, two of them to this page and a third to add some linkspam to the foot fetish article. Exploding Boy 00:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 15:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete If all the claims were true, there's a chance this person would be notable, loosely speaking. However, much of what the article says is not verifiable, and it's not gonna get improved. Anville 16:40, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Deleteunless she's notable within the foot fetish community. Perhaps one of the Wikipedians who want to keep the article can document her importance if they want it saved. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 16:51, 18 October 2005 (UTC)- Delete unless someone can offer evidence to meet WP:V.--Isotope23 17:50, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I think she is probably one of the better known foot-fetish models; "Lissa Noble" with quotes gets over 95,000 Google hits (did not make unique count), but her web site [1] has an Alexa rank below 1.2 million. MCB 20:58, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Isotope23. -- DS1953 talk 05:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep insofar as the objection consists in the verification of the information. This can be verified e.g. by an article by Mitch Persons, Lissa, Fetish Queen, Part I and II, also online here and here. Besides, an interview with Lissa Noble also confirming some of the information can be found at http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/lissainterview.html. --131.220.97.115 10:12, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
It's time to end this vote; it's nearly a month old and should have lasted no longer than a week. Exploding Boy 05:31, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: It's lasted so long because you forgot to do the third step in nominating for AFD, listing it on the AFD page itself. User:Cryptic did it for you (see above), but it has been five days, so it seems like it should be closed now. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 16:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.