Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisl and the Lorlok
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lisl and the Lorlok
Non-notable movie (?), filming not yet started - fails WP:CRYSTAL ukexpat (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No info exists on the film yet, at least nothing outside of YouTube. Also, the director is a red link. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Films not yet in production don't meet WP:NFF. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and consider deleting all the related articles this user is contributing as NN and as nanostubs. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL and failure of WP:V ... and I've also put Ignatius Fischer, the soi-disant director of this masterwork, up for AfD as well. RGTraynor 20:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, going on WP:CRYSTAL here. Nice web page, though. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable; very few Google hits. — Wenli (reply here) 02:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
