Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa renee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa renee

Lisa renee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

To quote from the article: "...Lisa Renee has been personally prepared, trained and downloaded by Interdimensional beings known as the Melchizedek Guardians through her Council of 12 known to her as the Sirian High Council..". Probably non-notable per WP:BIO, as she only writes a monthly column or two for Planetlightworker.com, and I'm not certain that being able to "...perceive multidimensional realities..." makes one notable. As you may imagine, the article has a verifiability problem too, as it lacks reliable sources. Bfigura ^(talk) 05:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. Would speedy, but there's some assertion of notability, however unusual it may be. Bfigura ^(talk) 05:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Hard to tell what kind of authorities the Melchizedek Guardians would be but they haven't published a lot except through Lisa Renee, so fails WP:Verifiable. Meanwhile, the website seems to offer a thriving market in "instructive" books, etc., and I would also suggest this article would be WP:SPAM. I suppose all this negative energy means I'm going to be forced to remain behind at the Great Ascension... darn it. Accounting4Taste 06:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or merge with Scientology. JJL 00:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like self-promotion to me. -Jmh123 22:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira 00:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, and agree with Jmh123 that this looks like self-promotion. Burntsauce 15:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.