Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa jennings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments for deletion point out that the article is unsourced. The one reference for the article says that she was a chorus dancer in a movie, but there are no other references to tie the rest of her life together. The article could possibly be a hoax. Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 03:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa jennings

Lisa jennings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't seem to have notability. — scetoaux (T/C) 21:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - There is a claim for notability in the article as a popular child actor in Japan. The current sourcing in the article is very weak but the article is very new. It should have been tagged for reference imnprovements (now tagged) and given a chance to be worked on before being taken to AFD. -- Whpq (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and move to Lisa Jennings. Stifle (talk) 23:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- Neier (talk) 11:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless sources are found. I tried, and came up empty; which is odd for the supposedly most-googled child actress. No ja: wikipedia article that I could find; and there are issues with the name (Asrari is not Japanese, afaik), and other parts of the article that make me suspicious. Neier (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as an extremely minor non-notable actress/model. I can find no references on the web in English or Japanese linking her with Ito-en. --DAJF (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep There really does seem to be some notability here, but the article has problems with references. I think it probably ought to be kept because notability is present, but it really does need work with citing the statements. I would support keeping this article if proper refs were able to be found (which, after Googling her name, looks like a hard-pressed task). --JamieS93 01:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless reliable sources are found to confirm notability. There are claims that she was a notable child star in Japan, but I can find no evidence of that. For all I know, this could be a partial hoax.--FreeKresge (talk) 16:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless sources are found to confirm the child TV popularity claims. The rest is non-notable if that does not stand scrutiny. I looked for some sources to confirm the TV claim and failed, but I'm guessing someone would need to find news commentaries in japanese pop mags from that era and we won't find much already in english. - Owlmonkey (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.