Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Shock

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 21:38, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa Shock

Biography, not notable The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:28, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, to the best of my ability to determine, she seems to be someone who posts many comments about her particular obsession on bulletin boards around the web. She may be intelligent, witty, and loads of fun at a party, but I don't see that Wikipedia should have articles about such lives, unless we want an entire category devoted to USENET flamers of the late 1990s. Jwrosenzweig 18:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Stirling Newberry 18:58, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• In addition to being non-notable, the tragic misspelling of "Katamari Damacy" and/or "Katamari Damashi" has tainted the Matrix. Delete with extreme prejudice. Nandesuka 19:21, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Well that is pretty much the most arrogant vote for deletion I have ever seen. She didn't write the article anyway. You should be deleted with extreme prejudice. Unsigned comment by anon IP 132.239.153.57, author of the article according to his comment here --Nandesuka 20:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC) Sorry. It is my first wiki entry ever. I misunderstood.24.165.29.82 21:46, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Doggone it, I put a speedy delete on this thing and the anon reverted it. Now, it's here. I have had it with these GameFAQs entries. I still say speedy delete under the new rules. - Lucky 6.9 20:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. Thatdog 21:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I misunderstood the standards of "notability" needed to have a wiki article. I was only writing it because I thought a lot of people would like to know about her. Apologies. I feel the entire deletion process was fairly heavy-handed. 24.165.29.82 21:41, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• No apology necessary. It's simply necessary to have a certain amount of general notability regarding the subject of an article. - Lucky 6.9 22:31, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Etacar11 01:05, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.