Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Robertson (Australian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to Ralph Fiennes per consensus. fishhead64 04:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa Robertson (Australian)

Lisa Robertson (Australian) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The incident received substantial media coverage and should be included in the Ralph Fiennes article, but the the depth of coverage of the subject is not substantial and therefore does not appear to meet Notability (people) guidelines Thin Arthur 06:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Basically her notability stems from the fact she slept with someone famous - not good enough. Delete per nom. Teiresias84 13:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Teiresias84. This does not meet the required notability guidelines by any stretch of the imagination. Thewinchester (talk) 13:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO and as noted. Orderinchaos 14:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. (John User:Jwy talk) 14:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Clearly not notable. While there has been press coverage, it is a tabloid story, not an encyclopaedic one Thethinredline 19:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Ralph Fiennes to assist anyone using her name to find out about the incident (although, there isn't much to add to what is already in that article).Garrie 22:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Ralph Fiennes although there are living persons concerns about the article as a standalone given the content. Capitalistroadster 02:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Ralph Fiennes article, this is a relevant incident that has occurred and should be documented in some capacity. Beeawwb 09:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect, tabloid nonsense like this has no place in an encyclopædia, and sleeping with someone famous does not make you notable. Lankiveil 13:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC).
  • Merge and redirect per Garrie. JRG 13:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep The Fiennes incident, while the catalyst for interest, lead to the reveation of other items of interest, admittedly of a tabloid variety e.g. undercover policeman who later works as a prostitute, lad's magazine model etc. Combined, these may just make her notable.--Mattinbgn/ talk 06:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. Persons only peripherally related to celebrities do not meet the criteria Ar-wiki 22:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.