Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Dawn Schneider (2 nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Punkmorten 22:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa Dawn Schneider

Delete. 2nd nom. 1st nom was June 2005. Still marginal, still NN, still one link shy of WP:DEP. This article is doing nothing, and the significance of this person is extremely dubious. - CrazyRougeian talk/email 20:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete See nothing notable. Dipics 21:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't see anything warranting her own article, yet. -- Targetter 22:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete One of the first issues that arises with this page, is the question: Does being a reporter for a major news network make one notable? The answer, unless the subject can satisfy WP:BIO, is no. With that claim of notability aside, the rest of the article is left fringing. Major newsources don't seem to garner coverage for this person[1] Also, it seems the subject isn't really notable in terms of being an art dealer from what I can see[2]. Yanksox 20:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • keep please she is special columnist at a major news agency on the arts Yuckfoo 21:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC) [3] [4]
    The first link is an article that links to an article that she wrote. The second link is the only non-trivial source, I could fine find, I don't see any proof of meeting any of the requirements of WP:BIO yet. Yanksox 21:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. As per nomination. Catherine breillat 23:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.