Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: Delete Prodego ^talk 21:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa_Brooks

This and two other related pages are vanity articles whose contents are either not noteworthy or unverified Ehusman 01:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - it's most likely vanity/spamming, but the content is notable. - Richardcavell 02:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I've adjusted the article to remove a lot of the congratulatory statements. - Richardcavell 02:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Although the article makes claims of notability, I question them. Being "under contract" means works for. Traveling and giving seminars ... lots of people do that. Doesn't make them notable, it is just a feature of their work. A colorist in Austin, Texas ... doesn't sound notable. The only notability claims that may be "above the bar" might be her celebrity clients.... however, I don't think every stylist who works on a celebrity is notable... Only the last paragraph about magazine features might make her notable. However, all of this is unsourced. And if it is the case that she was the stylist for models appearing in the magazines, as opposed to having articles written about her, then this is not notable. —ERcheck @ 05:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Borders on WP:COPYVIO from http://www.lisabonline.com/ - Lisa Brooks' website... see the About List section. The few minor edits since them make it not a direct copy, but if it qualifies as "plagarism". —ERcheck @ 05:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Very weak keep, just about squeezes into WP:BIO but only if the content - specifically regarding being featured in magazines - can be sourced appropriately. In light of of the information relevealed by  aeropagitica , i'm reconsidering. Delete.Rockpocket (talk) 06:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Looking at her website, it appears that she has received credits for the models' hair on magazine covers, rather than been mentioned on covers in her own right. Her winning awards might be notable but these need to be verified and sourced appropriately.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• This link might give a truer picture of events. If she's so great, what's she doing entering a magazine competition to work with a hairdressing legend in 2005? Cut, blowdry and delete. Vizjim 08:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Snip this article from existance per Vizjim. Kimchi.sg 10:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete – possible copyvio, notability claims unsourced – Gurch 11:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete let's wash this cruft right out of our hair. Notability unsupporetd by reliable sources, violates WP:VSCA. Just zis Guy you know? 11:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete dubious notability, unverified Dlyons493 Talk 12:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete clear Vanity advert Ydam 13:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Vizjim, WP:VAIN. RGTraynor 14:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per aeropagitica. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bucketsofg (talk • contribs)
• Delete notibility and vanity. Crazynas 16:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Lack of notability, unsourced claims.--Adrift* 18:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Malber (talk • contribs) 20:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.