Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linster OS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Linster OS

NN operating system that some kid came up with. -Bill (who is cool!) 04:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete "Under development in Microsoft QuickBASIC 4.5 and currently requires it" - Just a short BASIC program written by an individual for their own amusement. Fails WP:SOFTWARE, obviously. --IslaySolomon 05:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete giggles aside, "here's some junk I'm working on" is not an encyclopedic article. -- Xrblsnggt 05:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It looks as though this could become a good article, but at the current state, I feel it should be deleted. --Riley 05:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Unlikely. This isn't even an operating system - it's a set of BASIC programs that display a rudimentary UI. Zetawoof^(ζ) 09:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:SOFTWARE. Check out the "corporate website", too (I wouldn't buy anything from it...). --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Don't worry, the corporate site fails with a 404 as soon as you click the product link. Shame, I wanted to study their automotive division... --DaveG12345 14:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 17:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - This could become good. Theres better QBasic GUIs at http://gui.jacobpalm.dk --[[User:Fun50083|
• Delete - Why is this even here? It's about a small BASIC program written most likely by a kid. It clearly fails WP:SOFTWARE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EternalSausage (talk • contribs)
• Delete, just some random hack that few people dare to use. I wrote a shell/email/log thingy for Commodore 64 in Basic, like, wow, three or five people besides me used it; do I get an article too? Good luck with the project, but I guess this just isn't article-worthy unless people are queuing to download it... =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.