Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linkle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per author request; nn neologism. Resolute 23:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Linkle

Linkle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:NEO, no reliable sources for this opinion piece. Alksub 02:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Could even be a hoax. SolidPlaid 03:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is unsubstantiated with any references and seems like a useless neologism, possibly idiosyncratic. Accounting4Taste 04:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:NEO. There are lots of mentions of "Linkle" but the first few pages on web and scholar searches dont have this def. John Vandenberg 08:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as original prodder. Neologism. No reliable sources. Possibly self-promotional based on website where it was supposedly coined 5 days ago and the username of the editor who created the page. --Onorem♠Dil 13:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• After a little talking to about what Wikipedia is WP:NOT, author has requested deletion. [1] I've tagged as such for speedy deletion. shoy 22:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.