Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line Lokr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, done by myself a minute ago. Daniel Case 00:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Line Lokr

Line Lokr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable band, unreferenced and original research, fails WP:MUSIC (and slightly spammy to boot). Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete A7, non-notable band, so tagged. And if I see one more article with {{Infobox band}} in it... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Further comment. And why do so many band articles have almost everything wikilinked? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I didn't speedy because I thought statements like 'local venues with cover songs that everyone loves to hear' were at least an assertion of notability, albeit questionable and unverified. But I think it's a potential candidate. As for the wikilinks, well hey at least the article is connected to the wiki? :) Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
    • As for the wikilinks I'm talking about things like wikilinking all the band members' names, and all their songs... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.