Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay lohan's third album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lindsay lohan's third album

Lindsay lohan's third album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Yet more Lindsay Lohan-related crystal ball-gazing. No reliable sources cited here. Extraordinary Machine 11:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as unsourced, original research, and crystal balling. Recreate when a sizeable chunk of material can be sourced from multiple, reliable, third-party publications, and a title, tracklist, and specific release date is included amongst the attributable information. -- saberwyn 11:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, its repeated use of "it has been rumoured" is a dead give away, it's complete speculation, no RS, crystal ball, etc. María (habla conmigo) 12:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Meanwhile I think I'll watch Lindsay Lohan's eighteenth album. Just so I know about it in time to pop out to the shops. --Dweller 15:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Another example of something that doesn't have a name because it doesn't exist yet. Pretty much a bad sign. Arkyan • ^(talk) 16:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Unless there is definitive information, this article is nonsense. --AEMoreira042281 13:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The article stated that Lohan wants to work with those people. But is she really going to do so? Sounds like pure speculation.--Kylohk 16:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.