Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Redpath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Friday (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lindsay Redpath

Lindsay Redpath (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Insufficient notability, fails WP:PROF and possible vanity. DWaterson 00:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per non-notable. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no notions here of notability. --Dennisthe2 00:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom who was also kind enough to remind me of WP:PROF. Pig^man_dialogue 01:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The article is not-notable, possibly a WP:COI. Hello32020 02:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per non-notability and all above. Nol888_(Talk)^{(Review me please)} 02:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 03:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, I'm not able to find a bit of sourcing for this. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 05:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The first online MBA in a major country is notable, but I don't think she's notable. There was a third-party interview of her, but I'm not convinced CIPS is a reliable source. --Charlene 19:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.