Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Peeno
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) — Caknuck 15:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Linda Peeno
Article about non-notable person. Documented meatpuppetry used from Democratic Underground to edit article. WatchingYouLikeAHawk 07:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that counts as "meatpuppetry".
- Strong Keep. The article makes it plain how this individual is notable. I did ask others in a discussion board (DU) to help work on the article. It appears I am being accused of asking others to do something outside of standard Wikipedia procedure, and that is unsubstantiated. Asking others who might be interested in the subject to work on the article is OK. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 07:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Frankly, I am puzzled by this nomination. The article establishes notability quite soundly. Is there some agenda here? I am perturbed by the tone of WatchingyoulikeaHawk's accusations. Rhinoracer 11:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Fairly notable, Needs to be rewritten though or properly wikified. Wikidudeman (talk) 11:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I also must agree with Wikidudeman and Stevietheman. Very notable person and has sources. Callelinea 14:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable subject. In 2002 Paramount Studios made a Docudrama about her - see [1] --Chicaneo 19:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep', lots of google scholar hits. John Vandenberg 14:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
