Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Corby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Splash - tk 17:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Linda Corby

Linda Corby (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not assert notability. I came across the page because of the insertion of links to places like the author's store. There is only one substantial editor, and as a result the page may simply need cleaning up and removal of the parts that are basically adverts. (provided that the author is indeed notable) —— Eagle101 Need help? 20:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as NN. I can only go so far... that same editor is also "cleaning" (I use the term loosely) Cathy Jourdan which has been {{prod}}'d as spam from the publisher (Factfinder52 (talk • contribs • logs) previously Rcbookpublishing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)). — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 22:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment - possible conflict of interest, as article creator and major contributor, User:Tarbra, seems to be the subject of the article (or at the least, has Ms. Corby's bio on his/her userpage). — ERcheck (talk) 00:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment - Alterations/edits have now been made to this page and hopefully this page will conform to the rules. Thank you all for your comments and help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tarbra (talk • contribs) 07:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
    • Comment - possible conflict of interest, as article creator and major contributor, User:Tarbra, has been adding unsource violations of WP:BLP to Dick Francis and has included the same info on the Linda Corby page. --PTR 15:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep There is a conflict of interest but this does NOT mean that the article is notable or not. Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalk 22:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless the page improves. I agree with cocoaguy, a conflict of interest has no baring in this AFD. Arbustoo 00:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.