Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lim Bo Seng's Downfall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Lim Bo Seng. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-08 21:24Z

[edit] Lim Bo Seng's Downfall

Lim Bo Seng's Downfall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article reads like an essay or news report and is entirely unreferenced. It has major POV problems and is likely unverifiable. We could also question the need for an entire article on this man's "downfall." N Shar 00:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep This article could be improved, and a good start has been made on this. There is a main article on Lim Bo Seng and as he is a national hero in Singapore he is a noteworthy person. Some simple re writing of sentences should help. It is a useful addition to the main bio article --PrincessBrat 00:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge Whilst there are many writing and POV problems with the article, the article seems notable enough to keep. Otherwise, it could be merged into the main Lim Bo Seng article. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 00:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Lim Bo Seng. This topic does not appear notable enough for its own fork, but should be included in the parent article. Soltak | Talk 00:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge, no reason for this to stand alone.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 04:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per Soltak Tuvok ^ ^{Talk | Desk | Contribs} 12:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup This article only just meets the guidelines but if kept would need some major cleanup and ot take away NPOV problems.Tellyaddict 12:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge - and shorten! This is longer than the Lim Bo Seng article, which is just plain ludicrous. Totnesmartin 17:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Lim Bo Seng per Soltak. There isn't enough content here for separate articles. Article could use some clean-up to reduce hagiographic tone. --Shirahadasha 17:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Cleanup per Telly. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 20:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.