Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life on Mars (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Cancelled. AFD initiated by a banned user. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Life on Mars (TV series)

Violtion of WP:POV and WP:NOT SABTPC 01:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep unless the nominator can show where it violates either of those things. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 01:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep; I don't see the issue here. I don't want to say "bad-faith nom" but... —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 01:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Speedy Keep Eh? Strange nomination. This article is not perfect, but its a far-from-bad article on a valid topic. I don't see how this violates WP:NOT, and I don't see major POV issues (which would be grounds for rewriting/rebalancing not deletion anyway). 01:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The nominator only has 8 edits in his/her history but seems to be an experienced Wikipedian by some of his/her (cover?) edits (e.g. tagging an image for speedy deletion with the reason "orphan image"; using the abbreviation "rvv" for a revert) Bwithh 01:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Someone call for a checkuser? T REX_speak 01:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Why not? I don't know if we'll really get anywhere much, since this character's only got a handful of edits and nothing really malicious has been going on, but nipping it in the bud couldn't hurt. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 01:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above. VegaDark 01:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Seems obvious --Wildnox 01:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as per above. wikipediatrix 01:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• (edit conflict) Speedy Keep. (Televisions shows that have run at least a full season/series on BBC are generally notable. Nominations like this make me wonder about the nomination much more than the article.-- danntm ^T _C 01:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as per above. DBBell 02:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. Maybe the nominator's fingers slipped? Cat walked on the keyboard? Even if the article had big POV problems (HUH?!) as the nominator suggests, that would warrant a cleanup tag, not a deletion. My Alt Account 02:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep appears to be yet another "contribution" by the Spotteddogsdotorg vandal. TBTA 02:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep TJ Spyke 02:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.