Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LifeStyles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Babajobu 04:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LifeStyles

proxy nomination for User:Chooserr - has attempted speedy 3 times, being reverted. Also working on teaching him how to nominate - NO VOTEHipocrite - «Talk» 23:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - can't see how this can be usefully expanded from one sentence.--SarekOfVulcan 23:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. You don't? See Durex. Definitely a notable brand. StarryEyes 23:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Looking forward to changing my vote when someone does a similar fix, then. :-)--SarekOfVulcan 23:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, way too small unlikely to be expandable. Should be treated just as ruthlessly as my F.A.C.T.1 article was. Chooserr 23:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Making a point, are we? I'm not sure what FACT1 is, but I do know that at least half of all Americans between their teenage years and their thirties know of LifeStyles condoms. Raggaga 00:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Well, he's probably making a point, but it's still a one-sentence article. :)--SarekOfVulcan 00:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. One thing's for sure: if it does get deleted, someone will re-create the page within about three months. They're a very visible brand, in America at least. Raggaga 00:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, extremely well-known and important brand, WP:POINT. bikeable (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep huh, how come one one heard of this? (too many underage editors). —This user has left wikipedia 01:36 2006-02-02
• Keep very common, notable brand. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep because of it's notability. Even if it one couldn't write more on it (which I rather doubt), I don't see why it shouldn't be redirected to Ansell (which needs some work). Mairi 02:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Don't keep an advertisement just because it's the progressive thing to do. Ruby 02:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Well known brand of condom. Capitalistroadster 03:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. —Brim 06:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Ansell unless there's something to actually say about this brand of condoms other than "it's well known." Does anyone know? Are LifeStyles condoms notable or distinctive or notorious for any reason other than being a readily recognized brand name? -GTBacchus^(talk) 06:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• "
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)"
• Keep and expand. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Ansell unless expanded. Notable or not (and I lean toward the former, in this case), this is one sentence and a link, making it not even a stub. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable product. Cnwb 03:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Stong Keep. This is a very notable brand in the United States. --Descendall 07:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.