Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libtard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to List of pejorative political puns. howcheng {chat} 19:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Libtard

This is not an encyclopedic article. It's more suited for a dictionary. BlueGoose 01:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, as according to WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a slang usage guide. Sycthos^Talk 02:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as dictdef; also is sort-of an attack page Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef, neologism, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, POV etc. --Revolución (talk) 06:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no links, not even on categories listed on page.--MONGO 09:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of pejorative political puns, where this probably should be listed. I've heard this term often enough, so it's not a neologism, but it's not anything that would merit its own article.--Mitsukai 14:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect and add to List of pejorative political puns per Mitsukai. -- MisterHand 16:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per others. And Mitsukai, it is a neologism (literally meaning "new word"), it's just a notable one. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 23:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not Urbandictionary. Will 00:39, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as per Mitsukai and others Jawz 09:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above, although it scarcely qualifies as a pune or play on words - it would appear ot be a term with little currency among those able to comprehend words of three or more syllables :-) Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 13:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Mitsukai and others.—nihon 04:06, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, if you are keeping Repuglicans you should keep this entry too. Unless the Wikipedia is leaning towards the left? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistrmind (talk • contribs)
• Delete, same reasons as repug. Rhobite 18:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.