Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Librarians in popular culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn.

Please note that this close may be very slightly out of process, as Wikipedia:Deletion process does not explicitly state that a non-admin may close a nomination withdrawn by someone other than themselves. However, seeing as it does state you may close your own withdrawals, I believe this action will not draw any controversy. --tjstrf 01:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Librarians in popular culture

Not notable Keithmahoney 21:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Please provide a proper reason for deletion. A list cannot be "not notable," that doesn't make sense. By the way, I suspect this is related to this Fark story today. — Dark Shikari ^talk/_contribs 21:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Keep. This is a useful list which shows the many ways in which librarians are depicted in popular culture, both with and against prevailing stereotypes. Getting mocked by FARK isn't a good enough reason to nuke an article. ObtuseAngle 22:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Articles in Category:In popular culture exist to keep the crap out of the main articles. Read explanation on Talk page there. Pavel Vozenilek 23:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok. I understand now, that makes sense. I withdraw my nomination if that's possible. Keithmahoney 23:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.