Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberal capitalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: currently redirected to Liberal theory of economics - with no-one supporting the existence of this page as a separate article, this AfD appears to endorse a redirect somewhere, though where it should redirect is not AfD's remit. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Liberal capitalism

Original research and neologism. It's not clear if the author means that this term "is rarely heard in the United States but is used in other countries" or if he's admitting this is a neologism. eaolson 00:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• merge anythin useful to Classical liberal. Article fails to differentiate or justify its separate existence, instead says "But the capitalist crisis over the last 25 years, with its shrinking profit rates, inspired the corporate elite to revive economic liberalism. That's what makes it "neo" or new." Undesirable to have more than 1 article on the sub-topic. Ohconfucius 04:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Disambiguate to laissez-faire, neoliberalism, Keynsian economics. Gazpacho 22:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• On second thought, redirect to Liberal theory of economics. Author redirected to neoliberalism, but that ignores the 19th century. Gazpacho 23:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.