Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberal Bias on Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert 23:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Liberal Bias on Wikipedia
too short not enough sources not not notable
- delete self-referntial, unsourced. DES (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- delete wikipedia article commenting on wikipedia internal affairs? seems unlikely for an encyclopedia article. Better discussed in some other forum, like village pump.--Gaff talk 23:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not encyclopedic. Reads like a discussion.-Dakota 00:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This would be better served in the Wikipedia talk namespace. --Metropolitan90 00:20, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, either unverifiable or original research. JYolkowski // talk 00:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Move to one of the areas listed above. Then Delete.--CastAStone 00:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, self-referential & unverifiable discussion, belongs in the Wikipedia namespace if anywhere. --Bjarki 01:16, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I should of speedied it when I first saw it, oh well. --Fire Star 01:27, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- I think it's good that you didn't. I think it's probably not a good idea to speedy criticism of Wikipedia itself, especially if it isn't a clear CSD. JYolkowski // talk 03:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- For some reason, perhaps for the edification of the original contributor, or perhaps boredom, I was inspired to make it an exercise in POVectomy. I didn't feel right speedying it at the time, even if I couldn't put my finger on why. --Fire Star 03:10, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- I think it's good that you didn't. I think it's probably not a good idea to speedy criticism of Wikipedia itself, especially if it isn't a clear CSD. JYolkowski // talk 03:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Move to Village Pump.Merge with Criticism of Wikipedia -- but only if verifiable. --Jacquelyn Marie 04:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)- Delete OR. Xoloz 15:47, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.