Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liang Xing Long
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge Mangojuicetalk 15:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Liang Xing Long
Non-notable character within the Dragon Ball GT anime series, and a copy of information already found in List of dragons in Dragon Ball. Only one of these characters (Yi Xing Long) has any real importance in the franchise. I am coupling this with others and Evil Dragons as well. Small amount of different info on some pages that can be merged, but at most they should redirect to the listed article.
Included in nomination:
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all per nom. The WP:FICT guideline suggests that even quite major characters should be covered in sections of broad articles except where there is so much to say that a separate article is required to avoid unbalancing things. In this particular case, it is quite clear that it would be more useful for people unfamiliar with the series if all the dragons were discussed together in one article, so all the information was in one place, rather than forcing people to flip between multiple pages to learn everything about them. — Haeleth Talk 22:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all per nom and above. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 16:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all, do not keep as separate articles. -- nae'blis (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all and delete Evil Dragon and Evil Dragons. Totally unnecessary and I highly doubt anyone who might search for "evil dragon" is looking for Dragonball GT. - Wickning1 14:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Good catch, but I'd recommend just retargeting them to Dragon (disambiguation). I've done so for the latter, since it's not up for deletion here. -- nae'blis (talk) 15:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.